Melanie Kensington

[Huckfinn]

Hello all;

Does anyone have experience with Melanie Kensington from Erotic Canada?

7749

Thanks much.

Huck

[River]

Hello all;

Does anyone have experience with Melanie Kensington from Erotic Canada?

7749

Thanks much.

Huck

You should be able to find reviews on the other board, if you do a search.

Though I do not have personal knowledge of this SP, there is some debate as to the authenticity of her pictures. The general consensus seems to be that the pictures she uses in her advertising are not her, they are a close likeness.

Take that for what it is worth.

[SMP_Homer]

she does have a no-review policy, so reviews will harder to find than most

[Huckfinn]

Yes, I did see one review but you are right....she has a no-review policy.

Thanks chaps.

[Diogenes]

WHy care about her "no review" policy. Maybe she has plenty to hide?
Post reviews and comments about any SP.

I could tell you about one girl who conned me and ran, but I cannot remember her name. Too bad.

The more we hear about the various sps the better.
They have a review board of their own where they post "reviews" on men

[dtjohnst]

WHy care about her "no review" policy. Maybe she has plenty to hide?
Post reviews and comments about any SP.

I could tell you about one girl who conned me and ran, but I cannot remember her name. Too bad.

The more we hear about the various sps the better.
They have a review board of their own where they post "reviews" on men

If an SP sucks, people won't care about her NRP and will post that she's terrible. If an SP is good, the Johns won't want to do the review in case they get black listed. My regular girl has a NRP. I'd post a review if she was terrible...but she's not...she's amazing so I don't want to do so and risk not being allowed to see her anymore.

In other words, I would assume that a lack of reviews on a girl as popular as MK means she's probably pretty damned good. But that's just an assumption.

[JohnShaft]

is well worth the drive to London.

Best to exchange written communication with her first.

NRP remains in effect.

[thebopper]

If a girl is a paying advertiser on a board and she wants a NRP then she may ask the moderators to remove any reviews that are put up by clients.

Likewise if you knowingly post a review of a NRP lady you may have a hard time getting in to see her again if she is good.

The London crowd usually doesn't post overly graphic and descriptive reviews anyway so there are little details to be had when making a decision on seeing someone. The good ones are well known and the bad ones are obvious.

MK falls in to category of being a good one. I have heard she is very very hard to get a hold of. May be a UWO student.

[Zed]

My regular girl has a NRP. I'd post a review if she was terrible...but she's not...she's amazing so I don't want to do so and risk not being allowed to see her anymore.

But you could post her name so others could try her out, right? That, strictly speaking, is not a review. So who is she, DT?. :D

[dtjohnst]

But you could post her name so others could try her out, right? That, strictly speaking, is not a review. So who is she, DT?. :D

She's not taking new clients, so you couldn't try her out anyways. She's "semi-retired." In other words, she has a group of regulars she's had for awhile and as they move on she doesn't replace them. I think the reality is that, in her particular case, she only keeps the few of us around because she actually enjoys our company. We get together every week, but in my case it's only once a month as an SP/John. We'll go out for dinner, maybe grab a movie from time to time, heck, she's even come out with my mates and I for a beer on occasion though they have no idea in what capacity I met her.

It's like a "friend with benefits" kind of deal. And sure, I could easily get a "friend with benefits" that I don't pay for the benefits, but I'd have a hard time finding one with her skills or her wardrobe. Plus she knows what I like and I can easily afford her, so why bother?

It's a good arrangement for me, and while it's unfortunate for everyone else who can't experience how amazing she is (and she is, in bed and out), I have no problem keeping her secret.

Besides, to post her name here would violate the forum rules in that it'd be encouraging others to see someone other than who the thread is about. I know that I have read threads on EC where other SP's have said they've had clients when MK was out of town who were just filling the void until she got back and that MK was amazing. Personally, whether the photos are real or not isn't that big a deal (and I have reason to suspect they may be actual ads that MK has done as part of her "day job" as a bikini model, and are therefore highly photoshopped resulting in the disbelief some have had even after meeting her), everything I have heard implies that she offers excellent service and is a beautiful woman. The ONLY negative thing I have ever read or heard is that her photos may not be her but they are at least a semi-accurate comparison though the in-person MK may have a slightly higher body fat %. Considering the photos represent a relatively thin, fit women, a few extra pounds would be no cause for concern unless you're looking for a spinner. But if you wanted a spinner, I don't think MK's photos represent the type of girl you're after anyways.

[JohnShaft]

She's not taking new clients, so you couldn't try her out anyways. She's "semi-retired." In other words, she has a group of regulars she's had for awhile and as they move on she doesn't replace them. I think the reality is that, in her particular case, she only keeps the few of us around because she actually enjoys our company. We get together every week, but in my case it's only once a month as an SP/John. We'll go out for dinner, maybe grab a movie from time to time, heck, she's even come out with my mates and I for a beer on occasion though they have no idea in what capacity I met her.
It's like a "friend with benefits" kind of deal. And sure, I could easily get a "friend with benefits" that I don't pay for the benefits, but I'd have a hard time finding one with her skills or her wardrobe. Plus she knows what I like and I can easily afford her, so why bother?

It's a good arrangement for me, and while it's unfortunate for everyone else who can't experience how amazing she is (and she is, in bed and out), I have no problem keeping her secret.

Besides, to post her name here would violate the forum rules in that it'd be encouraging others to see someone other than who the thread is about. I know that I have read threads on EC where other SP's have said they've had clients when MK was out of town who were just filling the void until she got back and that MK was amazing. Personally, whether the photos are real or not isn't that big a deal (and I have reason to suspect they may be actual ads that MK has done as part of her "day job" as a bikini model, and are therefore highly photoshopped resulting in the disbelief some have had even after meeting her), everything I have heard implies that she offers excellent service and is a beautiful woman. The ONLY negative thing I have ever read or heard is that her photos may not be her but they are at least a semi-accurate comparison though the in-person MK may have a slightly higher body fat %. Considering the photos represent a relatively thin, fit women, a few extra pounds would be no cause for concern unless you're looking for a spinner. But if you wanted a spinner, I don't think MK's photos represent the type of girl you're after anyways.

Bolded=pertinent information.
Red=unnecessary self-aggrandizing commentary.
Green=provoking members.

All of the other information is just padding.

Do you ever respond directly to a point without getting side-tracked?

You throw the friend with benefits element out to tease, no to antagonize others. Mongy did that too. In my opinion, if you have that sort of rapport with an SP, MP, Dancer or Civilian the less said the better.

You have a way trying to demean others politely, yet still attempting to overly impress that you're more significant.

Just enjoy, nobody really cares who, what, where, why or how.

I gotta run, heading to a large gathering where opportunity may be knocking!

[dtjohnst]

Bolded=pertinent information.
Red=unnecessary self-aggrandizing commentary.
Green=provoking members.

All of the other information is just padding.

Do you ever respond directly to a point without getting side-tracked?

Do you want me to post examples? Because we're getting pretty off-topic here and there are numerous examples where I have done just that.

You throw the friend with benefits element out to tease, no to antagonize others. Mongy did that too. In my opinion, if you have that sort of rapport with an SP, MP, Dancer or Civilian the less said the better.

Mongy also mentioned it in EVERY thread about EVERY girl. I was specifically asked about my girl. If you can't see a difference between saying you're the greatest and everyone loves you vs I know 1 girl that happens to "get" me, I think you need to look closer. I'm also not entirely sure why you suspect I did to "tease" or "antagonize." My point is that it is possible to form a connection with an SP, and once you do you're much more loyal to her request than to post a review against her wishes just to "gain credibility" in an online forum. And really, how is it any different from a review where the guy says, "I think she enjoyed it as much as I did"?

You have a way trying to demean others politely, yet still attempting to overly impress that you're more significant.

No offence, but I don't believe you're in a position to know what I was trying and attempting to do unless you've someone managed to plant a bug inside my head and read my thoughts.

Just enjoy, nobody really cares who, what, where, why or how.

I gotta run, heading to a large gathering where opportunity may be knocking!

I felt it was better to explain not only WHY I'm not providing a name but also WHY I wouldn't provide a review of a woman who had a NRP. Sorry if you disagreed. I'll take your comments under advisement. To be fair, the question I was asked had NOTHING to do with MK, and I did post an entire paragraph about why I suspect, despite her not having reviews, she'd be worthy of a visit AND provided the source for that opinion. In other words, I'm trying to direct the thread BACK on topic. Perhaps the personal questions and comments for me would be better sent in a PM in future? I'll reply to them in a thread if that's where the question is asked, but I'll generally make a concerted effort to redirect things onto the topic at hand when that happens.

[Dick Gosinya]

I was specifically asked about my girl.

I think this statement proves John Shafts observation is correct.. And i think your sense of reality is a little off kilter..

[thebopper]

The only comment I would have here is that DT is providing what amounts to relatively unless information here about his relationship with this girl. Basically so what? Who cares?

He is stroking his own ego in fact stating a fabrication that is basically unprovable by him or anyone else for that matter. I suspect if she did see him and she took his money for service that she would not give him the time of day unless there was a payment involved.

Now that being said, MK is a paying advertiser on here and as a member of this board why not then DT have her post verifying your comments.

You have four days........Lets see.

[dtjohnst]

The only comment I would have here is that DT is providing what amounts to relatively unless information here about his relationship with this girl. Basically so what? Who cares?

He is stroking his own ego in fact stating a fabrication that is basically unprovable by him or anyone else for that matter. I suspect if she did see him and she took his money for service that she would not give him the time of day unless there was a payment involved.

Now that being said, MK is a paying advertiser on here and as a member of this board why not then DT have her post verifying your comments.

You have four days........Lets see.

Did you read the posts in question or just hop to one or two of them? Someone asked to post the name of MY regular, which is NOT MK. I explained why I would not do so, and then posted a paragraph later on trying to pull things back on topic to MK.

And for the record, just because something isn't provable doesn't mean it's a fabrication. There's 2 different concepts there.

[dtjohnst]

I think this statement proves John Shafts observation is correct.. And i think your sense of reality is a little off kilter..

But you could post her name so others could try her out, right? That, strictly speaking, is not a review. So who is she, DT?. :D

I dunno.....looks to me like Zed asked who my girl was....no? And to be fair, I don't mean "my girl" as in "my girlfriend," I mean "my girl" as in the girl that I visit that I was asked about. If that's where you believe my sense of reality is off-kilter, I would point to the dangers of trying to read tone into a web post, although I can completely see where my choice of words in that case was not ideal.

I'm not really seeing what all this has to do with MK though. Like I said, perhaps personal comments to me should be PM'd so as not to derail. I keep trying to bring the topic back to MK, it'd be nice if others could do the same.

[dtjohnst]

This is the post I was thinking of, made by Frankie, another SP in London, on the "other" board:

"I of course have not seen Melanie, but when I book new clients I do ask for references. A few of my clients have told me that Melanie has been their provider in the past and when she takes time off (which she does on occasion) they miss her services.

"I don't want to see a lady get too many bad reviews, and I have heard good things about her and that she has been missed dearly when she has taken time off. I know this because I have seen her clients when they could not schedule with her during her time away.

"Since she has been back on the board, I have not seen those particular clients, so to me IMHO, that says something positive about Melanie's services!"

There have been a few "concise" reviews done of her as well. One board member there said:

"I saw Melanie a few months ago and she was great. We spent an hour together. She gave me a nice massage to relax me and then we had a great time. (twice) Yes she gets you to wash your hands and yes she plays safe but there is nothing wrong with that. She is a great looking girl with amazing tits and a great ass. What else can you ask for? Normally I would not review anyone but I thought I should in this situation. Melanie you are great keep up the good work."

Another active member later said:

"I was a little bored a short while back, so I thought 'well, what the hell', I gave Melanie a call to incorporate her into my 'tri~fecta' weekend, and check out this entire situation for myself.

"I was quick in earlier posts to join the squad on the tin-eye reports and the rhetoric of factually accurate pics of this girl. Even if the Pics are not 100% her according to photo scan, well ....they are Damn well close enuff!!

"I will retract any statements that I may of said that were in any way fecetious or negative toward Melanie and submit my appology here!

"I had a great time, I would repeat!"

[Dick Gosinya]

They have a review board of their own where they post "reviews" on men

interesting..What is the name of this review board?